// Global Analysis Archive
A 6–3 US Supreme Court decision struck down President Trump’s use of IEEPA to impose sweeping global tariffs, leaving an estimated $175bn in collected duties without a defined refund mechanism. The administration is signaling a shift to alternative tariff authorities (notably Section 122, 232, and 301), sustaining trade-policy volatility as litigation and potential congressional action shape repayment timelines.
In 2024, the US, EU, and Canada imposed new tariffs on Chinese EVs using markedly different legal and institutional approaches, exposing the practical consequences of the WTO Appellate Body’s paralysis. The EU’s SCM-aligned countervailing duties contrast with US and Canadian domestic-law-driven measures, raising risks of retaliation, trade diversion, and further fragmentation of dispute settlement.
A 6–3 US Supreme Court decision struck down President Trump’s use of IEEPA to impose sweeping global tariffs, leaving an estimated $175bn in collected duties without a defined refund mechanism. The administration is signaling a shift to alternative tariff authorities (notably Section 122, 232, and 301), sustaining trade-policy volatility as litigation and potential congressional action shape repayment timelines.
In 2024, the US, EU, and Canada imposed new tariffs on Chinese EVs using markedly different legal and institutional approaches, exposing the practical consequences of the WTO Appellate Body’s paralysis. The EU’s SCM-aligned countervailing duties contrast with US and Canadian domestic-law-driven measures, raising risks of retaliation, trade diversion, and further fragmentation of dispute settlement.
| ID | Title | Category | Date | Views | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPT-1454 | US Supreme Court Tariff Ruling Triggers $175bn Refund Uncertainty and a Pivot to New Trade Authorities | United States | 2026-02-20 | 0 | ACCESS » |
| RPT-351 | EV Tariffs Become a WTO Stress Test: EU Rules-Based Duties vs North American Unilateralism | WTO | 2024-12-27 | 0 | ACCESS » |