DMZ Access Dispute Tests Armistice Governance and U.S.-ROK Alliance Coordination
The source describes a growing institutional confrontation between the United Nations Command and South Korea over who approves access to the DMZ, driven by differing interpretations of the 1953 Armistice Agreement and the DMZ’s expanding non-military uses. It argues that pragmatic delegation and formal alliance coordination mechanisms may be more feasible than treaty revision to reduce recurring friction.