// Global Analysis Archive
The source argues that China’s nuclear buildup is significantly shaped by Beijing’s assessment that U.S. and allied conventional precision-strike and sensing capabilities threaten China’s second-strike survivability. It warns that conventional-nuclear entanglement—especially in a Taiwan contingency—raises misinterpretation risks, while the post–New START arms control gap leaves few tools to slow the action-reaction cycle.
The source argues that South Korea’s unification-first doctrine is increasingly misaligned with North Korea’s nuclear posture, great-power constraints, and rising economic and social integration costs. It recommends a formal shift to managed coexistence under a permanent two-state framework, supported by institutional reform and major-power diplomacy.
The source argues that China’s nuclear buildup is significantly shaped by Beijing’s assessment that U.S. and allied conventional precision-strike and sensing capabilities threaten China’s second-strike survivability. It warns that conventional-nuclear entanglement—especially in a Taiwan contingency—raises misinterpretation risks, while the post–New START arms control gap leaves few tools to slow the action-reaction cycle.
The source argues that South Korea’s unification-first doctrine is increasingly misaligned with North Korea’s nuclear posture, great-power constraints, and rising economic and social integration costs. It recommends a formal shift to managed coexistence under a permanent two-state framework, supported by institutional reform and major-power diplomacy.
| ID | Title | Category | Date | Views | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPT-3229 | China’s Nuclear Expansion: The Conventional Counterforce Driver Western Debates Underweight | China | 2026-03-28 | 0 | ACCESS » |
| RPT-361 | The Unification Paradox: Seoul’s Case for a Permanent Two-State Strategy | Korean Peninsula | 2026-01-30 | 0 | ACCESS » |