// Global Analysis Archive
The source describes how a viral, numerically specific claim about references to the Dalai Lama in Epstein-related documents spread widely despite debunking, aided by early media citation and coordinated online amplification patterns. It frames the episode as part of a broader, institutionalized effort to shape international perceptions of Tibet and to erode moral authority through sustained controversy.
Source reporting argues that Indonesia’s people-centered development rhetoric has not translated into structural protections for Indigenous Peoples, who remain disproportionately exposed to climate impacts and development-related displacement pressures. It highlights climate disinformation and malinformation as enabling factors that legitimize large-scale projects while weakening Indigenous land claims and participation.
A Global Times investigative piece alleges the U.S. is driving disinformation, regional discord, and militarization in the South China Sea, reflecting Beijing’s emphasis on information-domain competition. The narrative signals potential justification for stronger Chinese countermeasures and raises risks of polarization and escalation following maritime incidents.
The source argues that South Korean hostility toward China surged after 2016 and became mainstream after 2020, with social media accelerating the shift by amplifying threat-based and identity-driven narratives. This dynamic is narrowing Seoul’s diplomatic flexibility toward Beijing and increasing the risk that episodic disputes harden into long-term policy constraints.
The source describes how a viral, numerically specific claim about references to the Dalai Lama in Epstein-related documents spread widely despite debunking, aided by early media citation and coordinated online amplification patterns. It frames the episode as part of a broader, institutionalized effort to shape international perceptions of Tibet and to erode moral authority through sustained controversy.
Source reporting argues that Indonesia’s people-centered development rhetoric has not translated into structural protections for Indigenous Peoples, who remain disproportionately exposed to climate impacts and development-related displacement pressures. It highlights climate disinformation and malinformation as enabling factors that legitimize large-scale projects while weakening Indigenous land claims and participation.
A Global Times investigative piece alleges the U.S. is driving disinformation, regional discord, and militarization in the South China Sea, reflecting Beijing’s emphasis on information-domain competition. The narrative signals potential justification for stronger Chinese countermeasures and raises risks of polarization and escalation following maritime incidents.
The source argues that South Korean hostility toward China surged after 2016 and became mainstream after 2020, with social media accelerating the shift by amplifying threat-based and identity-driven narratives. This dynamic is narrowing Seoul’s diplomatic flexibility toward Beijing and increasing the risk that episodic disputes harden into long-term policy constraints.
| ID | Title | Category | Date | Views | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RPT-944 | Epstein-File Claims as a Vector in China’s Global Narrative Contest Over the Dalai Lama | Information Operations | 2026-02-10 | 0 | ACCESS » |
| RPT-416 | Indonesia’s People-Centered Development Narrative Meets Indigenous Climate Vulnerability | Indonesia | 2026-01-30 | 0 | ACCESS » |
| RPT-15 | China-Linked Media Escalates Narrative Offensive on South China Sea ‘U.S. Meddling’ | South China Sea | 2026-01-19 | 2 | ACCESS » |
| RPT-753 | South Korea’s Digital Nationalism Tightens the China Policy Trap | South Korea | 2025-12-27 | 0 | ACCESS » |